A Comparison of BREAST-Q Scores between Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
Authors
Nicole K. Le, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Sarah Persing, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Jacob Dinis, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Kyle S. Gabrick, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Robin T. Wu, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Catherine J. Sinnott, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Tomer Avraham, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Anke Ott Young, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Michael Alperovich, From the Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; Yale School of Public Health; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery; Long Island Plastic Surgical Group; Yale New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital; and South Nassau Communities Hospital.
Publication Title
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subpectoral breast implant placement has in recent history predominated in breast reconstruction, but there has been more recent adoption of prepectoral implant reconstruction. There has been limited study to date of patient-reported outcomes comparing the two techniques. METHODS: Patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstruction between 2013 and 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients were asked to complete BREAST-Q domains comparing quality of life and satisfaction. Descriptive, t test, chi-square test, and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to compare BREAST-Q scores. Significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were 64 patients (114 breasts) who underwent prepectoral reconstruction and 37 patients (68 breasts) who underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Among the 101 women (182 breasts), there were no significant differences between BREAST-Q scores and implant position for the Satisfaction with Breasts domain (adjusted p = 0.819), Psychosocial Well-being domain (adjusted p = 0.206), or Physical Well-being Chest domain (adjusted p = 0.110). The subpectoral implant cohort was associated with higher scores, 53 versus 47, for the Sexual Well-being module (adjusted p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing direct-to-implant breast reconstruction had comparable BREAST-Q satisfaction scores for most modules regardless of implant plane. The subpectoral implant cohort scored higher for sexual well-being.
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0000000000008410
Publication Date
11-1-2021
Recommended Citation
Le, Nicole K.; Persing, Sarah; Dinis, Jacob; Gabrick, Kyle S.; Wu, Robin T.; Sinnott, Catherine J.; Avraham, Tomer; Young, Anke Ott; and Alperovich, Michael, "A Comparison of BREAST-Q Scores between Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction" (2021). All Research. 93.
https://scholar.bridgeporthospital.org/all_research/93
Identifier
34705769 (pubmed); 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008410 (doi); 00006534-202111000-00003 (pii)