Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators: The RAID Trial
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) remain a challenging problem in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether ranolazine administration decreases the likelihood of VT, VF, or death in patients with an ICD. METHODS: This was double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which high-risk ICD patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to 1,000 mg ranolazine twice a day or placebo. The primary endpoint was VT or VF requiring appropriate ICD therapy or death, whichever occurred first. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included ICD shock for VT, VF, or death and recurrent VT or VF requiring ICD therapy. RESULTS: Among 1,012 ICD patients (510 randomized to ranolazine and 502 to placebo) the mean age was 64 ± 10 years and 18% were women. During 28 ± 16 months of follow-up there were 372 (37%) patients with primary endpoint, 270 (27%) patients with VT or VF, and 148 (15%) deaths. The blinded study drug was discontinued in 199 (39.6%) patients receiving placebo and in 253 (49.6%) patients receiving ranolazine (p = 0.001). The hazard ratio for ranolazine versus placebo was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 1.05; p = 0.117) for VT, VF, or death. In a pre-specified secondary analysis, patients randomized to ranolazine had a marginally significant lower risk of ICD therapies for recurrent VT or VF (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.51 to 0.96; p = 0.028). There were no other significant treatment effects in other pre-specified secondary analyses, which included individual components of the primary endpoint, inappropriate shocks, cardiac hospitalizations, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk ICD patients, treatment with ranolazine did not significantly reduce the incidence of the first VT or VF, or death. However, the study was underpowered to detect a difference in the primary endpoint. In prespecified secondary endpoint analyses, ranolazine administration was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent VT or VF requiring ICD therapy without evidence for increased mortality. (Ranolazine Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Trial [RAID]; NCT01215253).
First Page
636
Last Page
645
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.086
Publication Date
8-7-2018
Recommended Citation
Zareba, Wojciech; Daubert, James P.; Beck, Christopher A.; Huang, David T.; Alexis, Jeffrey D.; Brown, Mary W.; Pyykkonen, Kathryn; McNitt, Scott; Oakes, David; Feng, Changyong; Aktas, Mehmet K.; Ayala-Parades, Felix; Baranchuk, Adrian; Dubuc, Marc; Haigney, Mark; Mazur, Alexander; McPherson, Craig A.; Mitchell, L Brent; Natale, Andrea; Piccini, Jonathan P.; Raitt, Merritt; Rashtian, Mayer Y.; Schuger, Claudio; Winters, Stephen; Worley, Seth J.; Ziv, Ohad; and Moss, Arthur J., "Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators: The RAID Trial" (2018). Cardiology. 63.
https://scholar.bridgeporthospital.org/cardiology/63
Identifier
30071993 (pubmed); 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.086 (doi); S0735-1097(18)35075-7 (pii)