Patient reported outcomes of emergency general surgery procedures

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

American journal of surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) involves care of a patient's often previously unknown disease in the setting of an unplanned interaction with the healthcare system. This leads to challenges collecting and interpreting patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: We performed a qualitative and mixed methods study using semi-structured interviews during the index hospitalization and at 6-12 months to capture peri-operative patient experiences. We compared interview findings to clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among 30 patients, two-thirds reported feeling no choice but to pursue emergency surgery with many reporting exclusion from decision-making. Females reported these themes more commonly. Patients with minor complications less frequently reported trust in their team and discussed communication issues and delays in care (all p ​< ​0.05). Patients with major complications more frequently reported confidence in their team and gratefulness, but also communication limitations (all p ​< ​0.05). Patients not admitted to the ICU more frequently discussed good communication and expeditious treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PROMs developed for EGS patients should consider patient outcomes and reflections that they felt excluded from decision-making. Severity of complications may also differentially impact PROMs.

First Page

118

Last Page

125

DOI

10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.01.021

Publication Date

6-1-2024

Identifier

38413350 (pubmed); 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.01.021 (doi); S0002-9610(24)00023-0 (pii)

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS