Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality for General Surgery Operations Performed Emergently in Adults

Authors

Robert D. Becher, Section of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.Follow
Michael P. DeWane, Section of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.Follow
Nitin Sukumar, Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.Follow
Marilyn J. Stolar, Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.Follow
Thomas M. Gill, Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.Follow
Adrian A. Maung, Section of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.Follow
Kevin M. Schuster, Section of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.Follow
Kimberly A. Davis, Section of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.Follow

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Annals of surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to answer 2 questions: first, to what degree does hospital operative volume affect mortality for adult patients undergoing 1 of 10 common emergency general surgery (EGS) operations? Second, at what hospital operative volume threshold will nearly all patients undergoing an emergency operation realize the average mortality risk? BACKGROUND: Nontrauma surgical emergencies are an underappreciated public health crisis in the United States; redefining where such emergencies are managed may improve outcomes. The field of trauma surgery established regionalized systems of care in part because studies demonstrated a clear relationship between hospital volume and survival for traumatic emergencies. Such a relationship has not been well-studied for nontrauma surgical emergencies. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all acute care hospitals in California performing nontrauma surgical emergencies. We employed a novel use of an ecological analysis with beta regression to investigate the relationship between hospital operative volume and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 425 acute care hospitals in California performed 165,123 EGS operations. Risk-adjusted mortality significantly decreased as volume increased for all 10 EGS operations (P < 0.001 for each); the relative magnitude of this inverse relationship differed substantially by procedure. Hospital operative volume thresholds were defined and varied by operation: from 75 cases over 2 years for cholecystectomy to 7 cases for umbilical hernia repair. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates for nontrauma surgical emergencies were improved when operations were performed at higher-volume hospitals. The use of ecological analysis is widely applicable to the field of surgical outcomes research.

First Page

288

Last Page

303

DOI

10.1097/SLA.0000000000003232

Publication Date

8-1-2020

Recommended Citation

Becher, Robert D.; DeWane, Michael P.; Sukumar, Nitin; Stolar, Marilyn J.; Gill, Thomas M.; Maung, Adrian A.; Schuster, Kevin M.; and Davis, Kimberly A., "Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality for General Surgery Operations Performed Emergently in Adults" (2020). Surgery. 44.
https://scholar.bridgeporthospital.org/surgery/44

Identifier

32675542 (pubmed); NIHMS1023557 (mid); PMC6803029 (pmc); 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003232 (doi); 00000658-202008000-00062 (pii)